<![CDATA[NO CoVax Ghana-Net.com - Covid-19 & Your RIGHTS]]>Sat, 18 Jun 2022 10:07:24 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[I'VE JUST HEARD THIS CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORY ABOUT A VIRUS BEING USED TO CONTROL THE ENTIRE WORLD POPULATION]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 23:19:46 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/ive-just-heard-this-crazy-conspiracy-theory-about-a-virus-being-used-to-control-the-entire-world-populationThis article was first published early Feb 2021
Governments around the World will embark on a round the clock, non-stop campaign of fear mongering propaganda aimed at scaring nearly 8 billion people into believing they are ALL potential serial killers if they break the rules. That they will infect and kill others if they disobey. That they MUST do as they're told "for the safety of others".
Article by Jude Nicolson - I've just heard this crazy conspiracy theory about a virus being used to control the entire World population.
It's ridiculous but, despite the virus causing a condition that 99.95% of people will survive, it's very existence is going to be used by governments around the World as a way of testing the obedience of the population to it's limits.
​Not only that, but simultaneously governments across the globe will conspire with massive pharmaceutical companies to engineer and deploy a mass programme of gene therapy technology wrapped up as a "vaccine" that will initially be referred to as a "magic bullet" but later be proven to be both unnecessary AND extremely dangerous.
The obvious question is "Why would billions of people allow themselves to be injected with such a substance?"
Visit also the ChildrensHealthDefense.org

The answer is FEAR.

Governments around the World will embark on a round the clock, non-stop campaign of fear mongering propaganda aimed at scaring nearly 8 billion people into believing they are ALL potential serial killers if they break the rules. That they will infect and kill others if they disobey. That they MUST do as they're told "for the safety of others".
This propaganda will convince billions of people that THEY are personally responsible for the safety of EVERYONE else. They MUST NOT break the rules. They will kill people.
But what rules?
Initially we'll be told we need to stay at home for just a few weeks in order to "suppress the virus".
Schools will close, shops will close, as will restaurants, pubs, sports facilities, museums, cinemas etc.
In fact ONLY shops selling absolutely "essential items" will be allowed to remain open.
Heavy fines will be imposed on any transgressors.
This initial "lockdown" will run in conjunction with a series of financial assistance schemes. Not due to any benevolence from governments but to suppress the will of citizens to complain about the imposition they are forced to endure. To stop them getting restless. To quell their desire to rebel. To subdue them.
These lockdown measures will continue (in different forms) for nearly a year during which time legislation will be passed in order to compel the populaces to wear a "face covering" in public places and to remain 6 feet apart from anyone they don't live with.
Additionally we will have the decision of who we allow into our own homes taken away from us.
We will be told how many people we can converse with in the park, (ALL indoor and outdoor group sports will be banned of course), and how long we can "exercise" outdoors.
We will also be informed that we are personally responsible for the ability of our health services to cope during this "pandemic". If WE step out of line the system will crumble.
And the media will go along with it. Unquestioning. Strangely compliant.
Meanwhile, we'll be informed that the "vaccines" are on their way.
We're told once the "vaccines" arrive we can start to get our old lives back

"WE JUST NEED THE VACCINES".

By now many millions of routine health procedures will have been cancelled. Millions of essential operations will have been removed from the schedules and waiting lists for hospital treatment will increase by several thousand percent.
Mental health issues will begin to overwhelm millions of individuals and families. Suicide rates will rocket. People will begin unnecessarily dying from cancer, diabetes, heart disease and strokes because they were too scared to ask for help, believing they'd be a burden on health services or they were worried about catching the virus in hospital.
Hundreds of thousands of closed businesses will NEVER reopen.
And all the while we're told "The vaccines are coming. The vaccines are coming. The vaccines are coming".

And the vaccines arrive.

And governments start to inject all the elderly and vulnerable.
And we're told "NOTHING has changed. The vaccines are here but nothing has changed".
Lockdown continues. Businesses remain closed. Masks are still mandatory. You still can't even THINK about getting your previous life back until EVERYONE is injected.
And just to enforce this point, new rules are imposed upon us and new penalties are introduced. Fines for "transgressors" are increased and we're even threatened with 10 years in prison if we fail to comply.
But then we all find out that the "magic bullet" is nothing of the sort.
It doesn't stop you catching the virus or passing it on to others.
It only reduces SOME of the symptoms in SOME of the people SOME of the time.
And we will need TWO doses.
But it gets worse.
More "Variants" of the virus are detected. They're given names like the "South African", the "Brazilian" and the "Kent"

We're told the "vaccines" may not be effective on the new variants.

We're told we may need THREE injections or possibly even FOUR, but these won't be available for months.
Meanwhile, everything is still shut. There is no end in sight.
And the media still refuse to question what's happening.

Then something happens.

All around the World there are reports of people dying after receiving the "vaccine".
In the UK the number of people dying from "Covid related" conditions in care homes rises threefold in two weeks.

Why?

Official figures are released regarding the reported numbers of adverse reactions from the "vaccines". The statistics are worrying.
But they're brushed aside by officials and "experts" as neither concerning or important. Nothing to do with the "vaccines". Just a coincidence.
And the media refuse to investigate.
The lockdowns continue unabated.
More people are "vaccinated". More die.
More businesses fail. More people jump in front of trains.
More children suffer. More families are ripped apart.
By now we're in an endless cycle of lockdowns, restrictions, rules, fines, arrests, hope then despair, then no hope. Just the realisation that this will NEVER end.
But it's OK. It REALLY is OK.
Because the vaccines have arrived. And that was the reason for all of this from the start.
Thank God it's only a conspiracy theory.
It could never actually happen.
Never.
Copied
]]>
<![CDATA[SAME SCRIPT, SAME TACTICS, SAME PLAYERS - 10 YEARS PRIOR THEY TRIED THE SAME BUT FAILED]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 23:03:57 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/same-script-same-tactics-same-players-10-years-prior-they-tried-the-same-but-failed“I remember vividly we were all lined up in the corridor and we were told we had to have it. It wasn’t a choice,” she claimed. “I was pressured into it. We were given no information.”
These NHS Staff Were Told The Swine Flu Vaccine Was Safe, And Now They're Suffering The Consequences
Dozens of NHS workers are fighting for compensation after developing narcolepsy from a swine flu vaccine that was rushed into service without the usual testing when the disease spread across the globe in 2009. They say it has destroyed their careers and their health. BuzzFeed

Victims of swine flu jab to get £60m payout

Lois Rogers
Sunday March 02 2014, 12.01am, The Sunday TimesSIXTY people are to receive a multimillion-pound payout from the government after they suffered brain damage caused by a swine flu vaccine.
Most of the victims are children but they also include six health workers. Peter Todd, a lawyer representing many sufferers, said the government would face a bill of at least £60m — £1m for each victim. - The TIMES UK
​Ministers lose fight to stop payouts over swine flu jab narcolepsy cases - The Guardian
Six million people in Britain, and more across Europe, were given the Pandemrix vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline during the 2009-10 swine flu pandemic, but the jab was withdrawn after doctors noticed a sharp rise in narcolepsy among those who received it.
The sleep disorder is permanent and can cause people to fall asleep dozens of times a day. Some narcoleptics have night terrors and a muscular condition called cataplexy that can lead them to collapse on the spot.

UK GOVERNMENT TO COMPENSATE BRAIN-DAMAGED VICTIMS OF SWINE FLU VACCINE

GlaxoSmithKline will pay the bill and claim the money back from the government (Means = From all of US Tax Payers, without consequences for any Gov. official etc.), though the company continues to deny a link between its drug and the disorders. Pandemrix was NOT used in the United States during the swine flu outbreak.

​THE BIG QUESTION

Have we learned about this Global Swine Flu SCAM?
Many people not! Obviously! Just see, how stupidly proud those are, who received their DANGEROUS EXPERIMENTAL Covid-19 Vaccine!!!!!
]]>
<![CDATA[TEMPLATE LETTER TO SCHOOLS ON MASK WEARING AND TESTING]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 22:52:51 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/template-letter-to-schools-on-mask-wearing-and-testingLegal Letter below, download the FREE PDF and print!
Studies into the efficacy of face coverings have thus far proved inconclusive, particularly with regard to the transmission of Covid 19/Coronavirus (2). In fact, some studies suggest that prolonged face mask use can cause harm (3). Therefore, mandating face coverings in the absence of reliable evidence, but with knowledge that they may in fact cause injury, will potentially lead to claims for damages against the school.
By Freedom Alliance Forcing a Child to Wear a Mask is Both Immoral and Illegal
Many parents are alarmed and dismayed by schools introducing mandatory mask wearing and PCR/Lateral Flow testing for their children.​

Download Free! Share Free!

Freedom Alliance have prepared a template letter for parents that can be downloaded and adapted for your particular school principal and for you and your child/children.
We hope that you will find this useful in protecting your family and please let us know how you get on. - Open PDF link HERE, or download, straight away, below.
school-mask-template-letter__1_.pdf
File Size: 81 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

]]>
<![CDATA[THE COVID-19 "VACCINE" SCANDAL, EHM SORRY THE CONTERGAN THALIDOMIDE SCANDAL]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 22:30:48 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/the-covid-19-vaccine-scandal-ehm-sorry-the-contergan-thalidomide-scandalIt HAPPENED ONCE, it HAPPENS AGAIN! This time, rotten and CRIMINAL Governments PUSH for the EXPERIMENTAL Covid-19 "Vaccines", which are NOT VACCINES, at all! This time,  it is an ATTACK on our all HEALTH!
And not "just the Swine Flu Vaccine-Scandal! (Even that the UK Gov. (aka = TAXPAYERS) pay out of 60 MILLION pounds compensations for Vaccine Injuries alone, to mainly children.)
Remember also the 2009/2010 Swine-Flu Panic? Governments, all over the world bought large quantities of that poisonous "vaccine". More people died or got disabled from that "vaccine', than those, who died of that "Swine-Flu"!
Victim advocates called the apology "insulting" and "too little, too late", and criticised the company for not compensating victims. They also criticised the company for their claim that no one could have known the harm the drug caused, arguing that there were plenty of red flags at the time.
Picture
REFUSE Covid-19 "Vaccination"!
This article is about the Contergan thalidomide scandal and birth defect crisis. For the drug, see thalidomide.
Phocomelia Cases of severe thalidomide-induced phocomelia. Baby born to a mother who had taken thalidomide while pregnant. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the use of thalidomide in pregnant women in 46 countries resulted in the "biggest man‐made medical disaster ever", resulting in more than 10,000 children born with a range of severe deformities, such as phocomelia, as well as thousands of miscarriages.
Picture
See the similarities?
Thalidomide was introduced in 1956 and was aggressively marketed by the German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal under the trade name Contergan as a medication for anxietytrouble sleeping, "tension", and morning sickness.[3][4] It was introduced as a sedative and medication for morning sickness without having been tested on pregnant women.[5] While initially deemed to be safe in pregnancy, concerns regarding birth defects were noted in 1961, and the medication was removed from the market in Europe that year.[3][6]
Picture
Cases of severe thalidomide-induced phocomelia
​In the UK, the drug was licensed in 1958 and withdrawn in 1961. Of the approximately 2,000 babies born with defects, around half died within a few months and 466 survived to at least 2010.[11] In 1968, after a long campaign by The Sunday Times, a compensation settlement for the UK victims was reached with Distillers Company (now part of Diageo), which had distributed the drug in the UK.[13] Distillers Biochemicals paid out approximately £28m in compensation following a legal battle.[14]
The British Thalidomide Children’s Trust was set up in 1973 as part of a £20 million legal settlement between Distillers Company and 429 children with thalidomide-related disabilities. In 1997, Diageo (formed by a merger between Grand Metropolitan and Guinness, who had taken over Distillers in 1990) made a long-term financial commitment to support the Thalidomide Trust and its beneficiaries.[15] The UK government gave survivors a grant of £20 million, to be distributed through the Thalidomide Trust, in December 2009.[14]

Aftermath of scandal

Picture
Baby born to a mother who had taken thalidomide while pregnant
The numerous reports of malformations in babies brought about the awareness of the side effects of the drug on pregnant women. The birth defects caused by the drug thalidomide can range from moderate malformation to more severe forms. Possible birth defects include phocomeliadysmeliaameliabone hypoplasticity, and other congenital defects affecting the ear, heart, or internal organs.[39] Franks et al. looked at how the drug affected newborn babies, the severity of their deformities, and reviewed the drug in its early years.

Grünenthal criminal trial

Webb in 1963 also reviewed the history of the drug and the different forms of birth defects it had caused. "The most common form of birth defects from thalidomide is shortened limbs, with the arms being more frequently affected. This syndrome is the presence of deformities of the long bones of the limbs resulting in shortening and other abnormalities."[33]
In 1968, a large criminal trial began in Germany, charging several Grünenthal officials with negligent homicide and injury. After Grünenthal settled with the victims in April 1970, the trial ended in December 1970 with no finding of guilt. As part of the settlement, Grünenthal paid 100 million DM into a special foundation; the German government added 320 million DM. The foundation paid victims a one-time sum of 2,500–25,000 DM (depending on severity of disability) and a monthly stipend of 100–450 DM. The monthly stipends have since been raised substantially and are now paid entirely by the government (as the foundation had run out of money). Grünenthal paid another €50 million into the foundation in 2008.
On 31 August 2012, Grünenthal chief executive Harald F. Stock who served as the Chief Executive Officer of Grünenthal GmbH from January 2009 to May 28, 2013 and was also a Member of Executive Board until 28 May 2013, apologised for the first time for producing the drug and remaining silent about the birth defects.[46] At a ceremony, Stock unveiled a statue of a disabled child to symbolise those harmed by thalidomide and apologised for not trying to reach out to victims for over 50 years. At the time of the apology, there were 5,000 to 6,000 sufferers still alive. Victim advocates called the apology "insulting" and "too little, too late", and criticised the company for not compensating victims. They also criticised the company for their claim that no one could have known the harm the drug caused, arguing that there were plenty of red flags at the time.[47]
Those of us, who have not learned from the Contergan thalidomide scandal and from the Swine-Flu Vaccine Scandal, are those, who happily run for the EXPERIMENTAL and DANGEROUS Covid-19 "Vaccine", and even worse: Giving PERMISSION to inject their children! I think, it is the MOST DISGUSTING thing, they do to their kids, and even BABIES! - Ghana-Net.com -
]]>
<![CDATA[WHAT? MORE AND MORE COVID-19 CASES, AFTER RECEIVING THE GUINEA PIG "VACCINE" / April 2021! News!]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:51:42 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/what-more-and-more-covid-19-cases-after-receiving-the-guinea-pig-vaccine-april-2021-newsOh what? Wait! That is "Positive" AFTER "Vaxxing"?  Double "Vaxxing"??? And that was in March / April 2021?
Before Lambda, Indian, Delta and now OMICRON?
Does that mean, being "vaxxed" doesent protect and does not hinder any spreading?
So, it`s not "Safe and Effective" then?  RIIIIIGGHT....!

​So, the Sheeple are still on the move to receive their 1st, 2nd and from September 2021 even their 3rd "Life Saving" experimental Covid-19 "vaccines". Some are pushed by their respective employer but many are just fully brainwash, after 365/24/7 days and hours of continuously fear-mongering 
by BBC - British BrainWash Corporation, also trading under the name of British BullShit Corporation. By there are other Brain-Washers at work, namely ITV, SKY CNN, CCTV (China), Aljazeera etc. and last but not least, all the shitty established printing press, if on toilet paper, or online edition. Of course, now these brain-washed sheeple shake their empty heads in disbelieve, of having been "diagnosed" with the oh so "deadly" "disease" of Covid-19, Flu. What a surprise!
PictureThe Silent Genocid
Surprise NOT, as doctors, real health professionals, top international virologists have warned about this to happen, a very long time!
You may ask, what is so bad of having catch that renamed FLU, 14 days - 3 weeks after receiving their dose of GEN and DNA changing Guinea Pig poison?
Well, it indicates pretty clear, that the "vaccine" isn't working as announced by Gov., big media and and Globalist Elites, like Bill Gates. The latter one "invested" a fortune into these "vaccines" and a Digital ID (ID2021 agenda). Many 1000s of "vaccine" receivers have died just after or hours after receiving this KILLER "VACCINE" And many, many more got disabled and need 24/7 medical or support attention! It is CRIMINAL! The Global Health MAFIA working day by day, HAND in HAND, to impose their "New Normal" upon us! We need to stand UP!
​*** Video can be downloaded, free!


]]>
<![CDATA[LETTER OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE CONSENT COVID-19 VACCINATIONS]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:29:56 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/letter-of-conditional-acceptance-consent-covid-19-vaccinationsJanuary is close and Police Check Points, to check if you dear to drive your TroTro, Truck, Okada or Taxi... without being "vaxxed", according to LITTLE Dictator Nana Addo`s mandate!
Well, here is a legal letter, to show to police etc, to agree to Covid-19, Delta, Indian, Lambda, Omicron or whatsoever made up "variant" "vaccination.  You may also give this to sign to the doctors and nurses, who want you "jabbed".
Why? Because that signiture  will make anybody, anyone 100% LIABLE to any dammage, to YOU or your family, after the "vaccination"! * Don`t worry, nobody will sign! And you are FREE to go! Without "vaxxing"!
Please note: These legal letters are from the UK, but as basic laws are similar or even the same in Ghana, this letter is a legal binding document, when signed!
​Download and print, below PDF form!

​LETTER OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE / CONSENT COVID-19 VACCINATION

Letter of Conditional Acceptance/Consent to GP/Medical Staff pursuant Article 6 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) 2005 and Data Subject Access Request pursuant Article 15 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Dear Dr/Mr/Mrs/Ms etc ………………..

I am writing to notify you that I shall only offer my consent to be vaccinated upon condition that the answers to each and every single question set out below is in the affirmative and all reasoning requested supplied to me as soon as reasonably practicable.

Q1: Are you Dr/Mr/Mrs/Ms etc ……………., exercising your duties as a medical doctor as laid out by the GMC and do you stand by that at all material times? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q2: Are you satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the COVID vaccine is sufficiently safe and effective for mass rollout without a marketing licence? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q3: Are you satisfied that a COVID vaccine is even necessary with the generally accepted survival rate from COVID-19 being around 99.96%, and the vast majority of recorded deaths being in the elderly and those with severe co-morbidities? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q4: Do you agree that this vaccination campaign amounts to a human experiment according to Nuremberg Code Article 6 and there being an absence of trials on animals that show its safety and efficacy and that my fully informed consent is therefore essential pursuant article 6 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights 2005? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q5Are you satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that refusing access to services against a person who does not agree to the Covid19 vaccine is not an act of discrimination pursuant Equality and Disability legislation, or an act of socio-economic and moral repression against natural common law principles of sovereignty in living men and women? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q6: Do you have in your possession or control reliable data, independently verified, detailing the precise ingredients in the COVID vaccine? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q7: Are you satisfied as a medical doctor/professional that such vaccine ingredients shall not individually or collectively cause me adverse psychological and/or physical reactions? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q8: Are you prepared to sign a personal indemnity for the benefit of myself and/or my heirs/next-of-kin upon full unlimited liability in your private capacity for any harm or loss of life experienced by me from adverse reactions following upon my taking the vaccine in one or repeated doses? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q9: Do you understand that concealment of data and blocking or wilful refusal to provide data or information relating to our personal data is a criminal offence under Data Protection Act 2018 section 173? YES / NO (Circle your answer)
Q10: Are you prepared to set out your precise reasons upon independent evidence for your affirmative answers to Questions 23, 5 and 7?

Kindly send me a reply autographed in wet ink within one calendar month in order to comply with Data Protection requirements and answer my concerns in honour and lawful transparency. Thank you.

By: (Autograph in blue)

​Download FREE - Share FREE!

conditional_acceptance_vaccine.pdf
File Size: 57 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

]]>
<![CDATA[LETTER OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE RE: REQUIRED WEARING OF MASK / FACE COVERING]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:12:56 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/letter-of-conditional-acceptance-re-required-wearing-of-mask-face-coveringPlease note: These legal letters are from the UK, but as basic laws are similar or even the same in Ghana, this letter is a legal binding document, when signed!
​Download and print, below PDF form!

LETTER OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE RE: REQUIRED WEARING OF MASK / FACE COVERING

I agree to comply with your requirement to wear a face covering/mask while fulfilling my obligations under the employment contract [or to gain access to the requested service] on strict condition that: 
  1. You answer in the affirmative each and every one of the questions below and
  2. You are prepared upon unlimited personal liability in your private capacity to accept responsibility to indemnify me or my estate for an amount not exceeding one million pounds for any financial loss, psychological or physical harm caused to me as a result of submitting to the repeated and prolonged wearing of a mask or face covering in honest reliance upon your affirmative answers to said questions.
Q1*: Has the wearing of a face mask/covering been scientifically proven to prevent human to human transmission of viral particles, taking into account the microscopic size (nm) of viral particles and the ease with which they are known to pass through materials of all kinds?
Q2*: Do you disagree with manufacturers who put on the packaging of face masks that their masks: “do not protect against transmission of viruses”?
Q3*: Are you satisfied, beyond reasonable doubt, that the wearing of a face mask for prolonged and repeated lengths of time is a safe medical intervention, and will not cause injury from oxygen depletion (hypoxia), a bacterial infection of lung tissue (pneumonia) secondary to inhalation of accumulated bacteria from the surface of said face covering, or even death from carbon dioxide toxicity (hypercapnia)?
Q4: Do you agree that the World Health Organisation are on record as stating that the wearing of face masks is not an effective or recommended method of disease prevention?
Q5: Do you accept that as a medical intervention the wearing of masks requires the freely given consent of the individual, pursuant Article 6 Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005?
Q6*: Do you assert that the requirement for face mask wearing as a pre-condition for access to employment [or service] is not an actual or potential breach of fundamental human rights under European Convention of Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, Equality Act 2010 or Disability Act 2010?
Q7: Do you agree that the wearing of a face mask/covering is a medical intervention which I am free to refuse, according to Nuremberg principles, without disadvantage?
Q8*: Do you have in your possession or control, an independently conducted Health and Safety Evaluation and/or Equality Impact Assessment, to support your position on legal and medical grounds, with regard to the requirement for wearing of face mask/coverings?
Q9: Are you prepared to set out your precise reasons upon independent evidence for your affirmative answers to Questions 12. 3, 6 and 8?
Q10: Do you understand that concealment of data and blocking or wilful refusal to provide data or information relating to our personal data is a criminal offence pursuant Data Protection Act 2018 section 173(3)? 

Kindly send me a reply with (if appropriate) personal indemnity autographed in wet ink as soon as possible and in any event within one calendar month in order to comply with data protection requirements (Article 12 GDPR) and answer my concerns in honour and lawful transparency. 

By:
Full Legal Name

Autograph in Blue
Beneficiary

​Download FREE - Share FREE!

letter_of_conditional_acceptance_re_masks.pdf
File Size: 65 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL - LETTER OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE RE: SARS-COV-2 TEST]]>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:02:29 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/legal-letter-of-conditional-acceptance-re-sars-cov-2-testPlease note: These legal letters are from the UK, but as basic laws are similar or even the same in Ghana, this letter is a legal binding document, when signed!
​Download and print, below PDF form!

LETTER OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE RE: SARS-COV-2 TEST

I will agree to comply with your requirement to submit to a SARS-CoV-2 swab on strict condition that: 
  1. You answer in the affirmative each and every one of the questions below and
  2. You are prepared upon unlimited personal liability in your private capacity to accept responsibility to indemnify me or my estate for an amount not exceeding one million pounds for any financial loss, psychological or physical harm caused to me as a result of submitting to such a test in honest reliance upon your affirmative answers to said questions.
Q1*: Has SARS-CoV-2 ever been isolated from an infected person and examined under clinical laboratory conditions?
Q2*: Has SARS-CoV-2 met Koch’s postulates which establish it as responsible for the disease named COVID-19, therefore posing a serious public health hazard?
Q3*: Were the World Health Organisation, the US Center for Disease Control and Public Health England all mistaken when they downgraded COVID-19 to an infectious disease of non-high consequence on March 19 2020, as posted on their respective web sites?
Q4*: Is the SARS-CoV-2 swab proven to be a safe procedure, or even necessary, when saliva from the oral cavity would produce equally reliable data regarding infection status?
Q5: Is the SARS-CoV-2 swab sampling via invasive nasal insertion considered to be a medical procedure, and as such comes within the ambit of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights 2005, therefore requiring fully informed consent pursuant Article 6 of said Declaration?
Q6: Do you agree that SARS-CoV-2 swabbing is a medical intervention which I am free to refuse, according to Nuremberg principles, without disadvantage?
Q7*: Is the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test 100% reliable so as to avoid false positive and false negative results in statistically significant numbers? 
Q8*: Was the inventor of said RT-PCR test Dr Kary Mullis (deceased 2019) mistaken when he said this test is not designed for or meant to be used as a diagnostic tool?
Q9: Are you satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that refusing access to services against a person who does not agree to the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test is not an act of discrimination pursuant Equality and Disability legislation, or an act of socio-economic and moral repression against natural common law principles of sovereignty in living men and women?
Q10: Are you satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that any consequences for failing to agree to be swabbed for SARS-CoV-2 shall not constitute infringement of my rights pursuant European Convention on Human Rights and/or the Human Rights Act 1998, or my rights to privacy pursuant General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)?  
*Q11: Are you prepared to set out your precise reasons upon independent evidence for your affirmative answers to Questions 1234, and 8?
Q12: Do you understand that concealment of data and blocking or wilful refusal to provide data or information relating to our personal data is a criminal offence pursuant Data Protection Act 2018 section 173? 

Kindly send me a reply autographed in wet ink as soon as possible and in any event within one calendar month in order to comply with Data Protection requirements (Article 12 GDPR) and answer my concerns in honour and lawful transparency. 

By:
Full Legal Name

Autograph in Blue
Beneficiary

Download FREE - Share FREE!

letter_of_conditional_acceptance-covid-swab-test.pdf
File Size: 67 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

]]>
<![CDATA[Merry Christmas from... Genocide - VIDEO]]>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:47:50 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/merry-christmas-from-genocide-videoIt beginns to look like GENOCIDE.... Everywhere you go...
Enjoy this SPECIAL CHRISTMAS video, and don`t forget to SHARE! After all, that`s what we do,
sharing with family and friends! And maybe there is even some lovely person, who shares this video with the self-proclaimed DICTATOR of Ghana, Nana Addo!
]]>
<![CDATA[PLANdemic NOT pandemic! It is a SCAMdemic! And Ghana Gov is in it!]]>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:48:24 GMThttp://ghana-net.com/covid-19--your-rights/plandemic-not-pandemic-it-is-a-scamdemic-and-ghana-gov-is-in-itYou really think, that Ghana Gov is not aware what is going on? They KNOW! 
The question is since when and not if!
Below video shows how, in Ocrober 2019, the "Pandemic" has been in end stage planning!
]]>